Thu
HouseValues struggle continues
Posted by Marlow Harris under Real Estate
[5] Comments
Joel Burslem snagged an interview with Ian Morris, CEO of beleaguered HouseValues, and the take-away was that they were going to focus on their Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform which allows the agents to manage any leads they receive and develop a business relationship with that individual, probably using drip campaigns involving emails and follow-up phone calls.
Brian Villanueva of Omega Realtors in Northern California made the following points recently on an Inman message board:
HouseValues is a classic investment banking (later called dot-com) scam:
1) Spend millions on marketing to create industry buzz.
2) Ramp up volume very quickly without regard for sustainability.
3) Deride critics as “behind the times”, not able to understand your “superior business model”.
4) Go public to create liquidity.
5) Have your board members and angel investors sell their shares and cash out.Don’t take my word for it though. The proof is in the results:
IAN MORRIS (CEO) – $1,037,249 in shares sold
MARK POWELL (founder) – $9,900,000 sold
MICHAEL NELSON (board member) – $18,089,854 sold
and many more….Since 2005, the executives, board of directors, and venture capitalists of HouseValues made $43.4M in options sales. That’s 40% of the market cap of the entire company today. While they were cashing out, HouseValues share price has dropped by 80%, completely screwing the small investor.
These guys fleeced Realtors and investors to make themselves extremely wealthy. And no major trade group (where are you NAR!!!) or media outlet has ever called them on it.
Documentation of all above numbers is at http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=SOLD
HouseValues.com does not get it’s revenue from real estate buyers or sellers, but from real estate agents who are desperate for leads. These agents pay up $200, maybe as high as $500-$600 a month, for zip codes in targeted areas. For this, they are promised a certain number of leads per month.
There are dozens of entries from angry real estate agents from across the country on Rip-off Report.com and there appear to be dozens of other sites that are filled with complaints about this company.
StockLemon.com suggests that HouseValues is not a viable business model, that it faces too many competitors offering the same information for free (i.e., not asking for personal information), and that there is radically increasing customer acquisition cost, since HouseValues already spends nearly 50% of every revenue dollar on line item “Sales and Marketing Expense.” They have recently begun to give seminars to teach agents how to “work the leads”. Seminars are a costly business that will eventually eat into the bottom line, and that in a declining market, their customer base (i.e. agents) will be leaving the business.
If Housevalues.com was providing a valuable service to real estate agents, if the leads were good and the service worked as promised, agents would be ecstatic and happily pay their monthly fees.
However, that is not what happens. Homeowners are promised that they will receive their homes value, online. What they receive, however, is an email or phone call from an agent. Why? Because the information the homeowner enters online is sold to an agent as a “lead”. Even if the homeowner isn’t planning on selling. But each homeowner contact is sold to an agent as a lead because there is not an option on the HouseValues input screen that says “Just Curious” or “Just Wondering”. It’s not the agents fault. They think they’re buying viable leads. It’s not the homeowners fault, as they think they’re just going to get a number spit out of a computer program.
According to the SEC filings on HouseValues, their churn rate, which measures the rate at which subscribers cancel, ranges from 6 to 6.5% per month. Essentially, 72% to 78% of its customer base cancels its subscription every year. This does not speak well of the HouseValues product. It could be that its questionable marketing tactics, the high customer (agent) churn rates, and the importance and validity of such sites as Zillow will soon catch up to Housevalues.com.
5 Responses to “ HouseValues struggle continues ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[...] Praise. . http://realtytimes.com/rtapages/20060829_housevaluescheerlead… http://360digest.com/2007/02/08/housevalues-struggle-continue… Note: You can’t help an agent with good leads who doesn’t know how to [...]








Great post, Marlow.
We tried HouseValues back in 2002, I believe it was. We never received the volume of leads we were promised… and often the leads that we did receive were outside of our territory.
Of all the CMA’s that we did… which included many onsite inspections of the properties… we never got a single listing.
Most people were either curious… or thinking of doing a cash out refi.
I start laughing hysterically whenever they call me to solicit my business… which, oddly enough, they still do.
Some agents pay much more than $500/month. When I spoke with HouseValues they had zip codes that were selling for over $1000/month, and that’s here in Utah. I can imagine some areas the cost is much higher.
I think it’s prudent for them to focus on their CRM product, which is actually a pretty good product and could be improved upon into a very good resource for agents and other sales people.
The “Just Listed” and HouseValues” pieces are crumbling as agents and brokers assert their own brands online, and do it much better and with more value.
Very good article. It might be worth noting again that Housevalues.com preys on new and less experienced agents. Most of the ones I have talked too (include myself in this group as well) leave the program because it doesn’t generate the leads they promise. If agents are the ones paying for the service and the agents quit, where is the income? I was solicited to join the program while I was already in the program. I smelled desperation and bailed. I also agree, where is the NAR in this? HouseValues.com sets up booths at the conventions and advertises with the NAR. Shouldn’t the NAR be looking out for it’s members’ interests?
Im not sure why someone would work with housevalues. Every agent is offering a free cma as part of their marketing. Its always been that way just give then a call or email. Essentially thats exactly what Housevalues does. Except after they connect a seller and an agent together they collect a fee. I guess I give props to HouseValues, Im not sure how you did it but they did.