Wed 31 May 2006

Redfin announced today an $8 million dollar cash infusion from the likes of Paul Allen’s Vulcan Capital, Madrona Venture Group, BEV Capital and The Hillman Co. Total financing now stands at nearly $9 million dollars to expand the online discount brokerage.
John Cook’s article “Redfin closes on $8 million funding” has the details and background. It states “Since starting the service earlier this year, Redfin has helped Seattle-area buyers purchase more than 40 homes valued at about $18 million.”
However, when I just did a search on the NWMLS, as of 9AM this morning, there were only 13 closed sales valued at only about $7 million dollars since they’ve started their new sales model. If they’re getting a 3% sales commission and refunding 2% of that and keeping 1% for themselves, they’ve made about $70K so far this year. Is that enough to justify a $9 million dollar investment?
I’ve attached the statistics here.
I imagine they’re poised to make this announcement at their big party tonight (I guess that’s where part of that $9 million is going….) Tonight’s the big Tech Crunch shindig at Conworks to toast Michael Arrington, sponsored by Redfin. Arrington comments today on the news in Tech Crunch “Redfin to change the rules of real estate sales“.
(I’m not sure that place is such a good choice for a party. Conworks is the art space hijacked by the staff from the founder, Matt Richter, and I think they’ve lost most of their subscription base and have had to resort to renting out their space to the highest bidder. I have been unable to support the organization since Richter’s ousting, but haven’t found it to be much of a sacrifice since their programming sucks since he’s left.)
I ran across this interesting piece on Redfin from Mortgage News Daily, Redfin lacks Zillow’s hype but may ultimately have more impact The author seems pretty well-informed about the company and offers this interesting observation on the dilemma faced by listing agents asked to show listings to Redfin clients:
In some states the listing agent would be within his rights for liability reasons to insist that the buyer be accompanied by his buyer’s agent on any visit to the listed property.
Actually, no agent in any state must show a house to a stranger. Nothing in any state law compels an agent to place themselves in harm’s way, if they feel that accompanying a stranger or meeting a stranger at a house will or could harm them.
Redfin Buzz….
Rain City Guide
John Cook’s Venture Blog
Virtual Broker
Silicon Beat
San Jose Mercury News (There’s an interesting bit of misinformation in this article “… considering Redfin’s progress in the Seattle area, it has promise. Redfin’s sole agent there has completed about 20 transactions since its February launch — a quick pace for the industry — mostly by working with the tech-savvy, do-it-yourself crowd” Actually, the NWMLS lists 6 licensed agents hanging their hat at Redfin.)
More Redfin buzz….
Post Bubble
David Brunelle
Lopolis








May 31st, 2006 at 10:36 am
Great info here. I spoke with Redfin’s Director of Marketing this morning and he was understandably excited about the launch, but this is some good dirt on their revenue model!
May 31st, 2006 at 10:42 am
[…] Update: I may just have to move Redfin into the Orange column, even after their $8 million VC funding annoucement today… Marlow over at 360Digest has unearthed some interesting facts about their business model. […]
May 31st, 2006 at 10:58 am
VC Rating: Redfin
Company: Redfin Description: Online real estate broker Competitors: ZipRealty Location: Seattle Amount Raised: $8 million Round: Second Date Announced: 5/31/06 VC Firms: Vulcan Capital, BEV Capital, The Hillman Company, The Madrona Venture Group VC Di…
May 31st, 2006 at 12:29 pm
[…] Marlow of 360° Digest has some interesting insight on Redfin here. […]
May 31st, 2006 at 12:57 pm
Hi Marlow,
Redfin’s press release says that Redfin has 40 pending or closed transactions, but in your post you are only measuring closed transactions. Many of our sales have come recently. The number that are pending or closed suggests to us that many sellers are glad to have Redfin buyers touring their properties, and that our customers (many from Amazon and Microsoft) are well-qualified to buy.
Regards,
Glenn
May 31st, 2006 at 1:30 pm
If you think Redfin is great, then you’re obviously not a potential home buyer or seller. Inaccurate search and local information, combined with no market knowledge yields a whole lot of nothing in the buyer/seller mind.
Master your domain!
www.reyestate.com
May 31st, 2006 at 1:41 pm
Glenn,
Thanks for the clarification. You’re right, those 13 sales are Redfin’s CLOSED sales for 2006.
All I have to go on for information are the newspaper articles and interviews you’ve been doing, so perhaps you should put me on your press release list so I can get the info straight from the horse’s mouth
Congratulations on your good fortune!
— Marlow
June 18th, 2006 at 10:57 am
[…] Redfin Redux […]
June 29th, 2006 at 8:29 pm
[…] Of all the fascinating things I’ve seen, the most impressive was the painstaking deconstruction of the redfin.com numbers. We can scale those results any way we want and they still stink. Any brick ‘n’ mortar accountant could do the math. As with Web 1.0, it doesn’t matter how many different ways you shout down the numerical analysis, ten trillion times a tiny loss is a huge loss. […]